Russian drone strike kills 65-year-old woman in Kherson

A 65-year-old woman was killed in a Russian drone attack on Kherson on the evening of July 14, 2025, according to Oleksandr Prokudin, head of the Kherson Oblast Military Administration.

The strike occurred around 7 p.m. The 65-year-old woman sustained fatal injuries in the attack.

Prokudin also expressed his condolences to the victim’s family.

On July 14, Russian forces attacked Kherson, injuring four civilians. All suffered blast-related trauma and shrapnel wounds.

Additionally, a man was killed in a Russian attack on Antonivka on July 6, according to Prokudin.

On the morning of June 5, the Russian military attacked Novodmytrivka in the Kherson Oblast and killed a 70-year-old woman.

On July 4, they killed a 57-year-old man. Russian aggression injured a total of 11 people in the Kherson Oblast that day.

By way of background, Russian army personnel frequently target civilians in the Kherson Oblast with drone attacks. Local authorities regularly report casualties caused by explosives dropped from drones. Previously, the Financial Times reported that Russia may be using these strikes to train operators of kamikaze drones.

Previously, the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine released a report in which the commission concluded that Russian armed forces have committed murder of civilians as crimes against humanity and war crimes using drones.

The Commission pointed out that from July 2024, Russian forces have repeatedly killed and injured civilians in an area stretching over more than 100 kilometres along the right bank of the Dnipro River in Kherson Province.

The Commission examined over 300 publicly available videos of attacks and over 600 text posts on Telegram channels and, where possible, identified victims of these attacks. It interviewed 91 persons from the areas affected by drone attacks, including victims, witnesses, local authorities and medical personnel.

The drone attacks have been widespread, systematic and conducted as part of a coordinated state policy, the report said.

The attacks followed a regular pattern and the same modus operandi, demonstrating that they were planned, directed, and organized. There is no information suggesting that Russian military and civilian authorities have taken any steps to prevent or stop the commission of the crimes, the Commission stressed in its report.

Nearly 150 civilians have been killed and hundreds more injured as a result of the drone attacks in Kherson city and 16 localities in the Ukrainian-controlled areas, according to official sources. The victims were mostly men, although women and children were also amongst the victims. Civilians were targeted in various circumstances, as they stepped out to carry out their daily activities, whether on foot or in any type of vehicle.

The drone operators used video feeds transmitted in real time by the cameras embedded in the drones, focused on targets that were visibly civilian, and dropped explosives on them. Hundreds of these video feeds have been regularly disseminated on Russian Telegram channels, some of them with thousands of subscribers, displaying the crimes, as well as text posts announcing further attacks.

The Commission pointed out that the drone attacks caused deaths, grave bodily injuries, including amputations, cuts and concussions, and also led to psychological trauma and fear.

Ambulances, which have special protection under international law, have been targeted and struck by drones, so as to prevent them from reaching victims who had been previously attacked. Some of these victims have died as a consequence of not being moved to a medical facility in time.

A 45-year-old man from Stanislav village recounted that in November 2024, a drone dropped an explosive near him as he was riding a moped, badly injuring his leg. An ambulance arrived, and while he was receiving first aid, a drone dropped two explosives on the ambulance.

The Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine stated that the use of drones to target civilians and civilian objects is a violation of the fundamental principle of international humanitarian law, according to which attacks may only be directed at military objects.

“The evidence collected leaves no doubt that the perpetrators intended to carry out these acts. The Commission, therefore, concludes that the Russian armed forces perpetrated the war crime of intentionally directing attacks against civilians in Kherson Province. It also finds that posting videos of civilians being killed and injured amounts to the war crime of outrages upon personal dignity”, the Commission stated in its report.

It also highlighted that the civilian population in the areas affected by drone attacks lives in constant fear. Residents take risks every time they go outside, as they fear being struck by drones. Many wait for cloudy days to go out, or seek cover under trees, where possible. Fear is further induced by frequent messages posted on Telegram, such as “Get out of the city before the leaves fall, you who are destined to die.”

The circumstances of the attacks, the videos, and the explicit threatening text posts demonstrate that Russian armed forces and those supporting them have committed acts or threats of violence for the primary purpose of spreading terror among the civilian population, in violation of international humanitarian law.

Referring to Russian soldiers, a senior health professional of a hospital in Kherson said:

“They are simply chasing and hunting civilians who are on their way to work or walking their dogs. They drop explosives from drones like it is a video game.”

The Commission explained that the scale and intensity of the drone attacks against civilians and civilian objects as well as the destruction of houses and basic infrastructure, the targeting of all means of transport, and attacks against emergency and rescue services, have all rendered the affected areas unliveable and left many residents with no other choice than to flee. 

“The recurrent drone attacks, the widely disseminated videos showing them, and numerous posts explicitly exhorting the population to leave, suggest a coordinated state policy on the part of the Russian authorities to force the population of Kherson Province to leave the area. The Commission, therefore, concludes that the Russian armed forces may have committed the crime against humanity of forcible transfer of population,” the Commission concluded.

The UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine is an independent body mandated by the UN Human Rights Council to investigate all alleged violations and abuses of human rights, violations of international humanitarian law, and related crimes in the context of the Russian Federation’s aggression against Ukraine. The Commission comprises Erik Møse (Chair), Pablo de Greiff, and Vrinda Grover.

The Commissioners were appointed by the President of the UN Human Rights Council; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. While the UN Human Rights Office provides support to the Commission of Inquiry, the commissioners serve in their individual capacity and are independent from any government or organization, including the UN. Any views or opinions presented herein are solely those of the mandated commissioners.

Read also: Russia ignores global calls to stop war for 100 days – MFA of Ukraine

Meanwhile, the European Pravda news outlet, citing several EU diplomats familiar with the ongoing discussions on sanctions against Russia, reported that two European Union member states – Slovakia and Malta – are currently not supporting the adoption of the EU’s 18th package of sanctions against Russia.

One of the sources said that during the Coreper (the EU Committee of Permanent Representatives) meeting on 13 July, diplomats spent several hours discussing the 18th sanctions package. Slovakia continues to insist on its position: it will block sanctions against Russia until it receives guarantees from the European Commission that it will not suffer losses after the EU fully phases out Russian gas by 2028.

Malta has also opposed the package. The country objects to lowering the price cap on Russian oil.

Another diplomat said that Malta, like Greece and Cyprus, is a country with a large tanker fleet, and its economy relies on oil transportation. That is why these countries did not support lowering the price ceiling on Russian oil. Only Malta insisted on rejecting the proposal at the meeting of EU ambassadors on Sunday.